Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 14, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 00-0158PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Kathleen K. Johnson appeals from an order of the probate court and argues that the court erred by ordering her to reimburse moneys and relinquish property to the estate.1 We are chiefly asked to decide whether a creditor who improperly received estate property, but then disposed of it, can be ordered to pay the value of the property to the estate pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 14-3909 (1995). We hold that the probate court can enter such an order against a creditor. Therefore, we affirm the court’s order, but remand for the reasons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Herman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. In Re Marriage of BergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Maleki v. Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. St. George v. PlimptonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Arizona State University Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API