Legal Opinion

Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of Beaverton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 2006No. 2005-073; A131242PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The City of Beaverton (city) adopted an ordinance annexing property owned by petitioner Leupold & Stevens, Inc., without petitioner’s consent. Petitioner appealed the ordinance to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). In the meantime, the legislature enacted a statute pertaining to local government authority to annex certain properties without owner consent. Petitioner argued to LUBA that the new statute retroactively eliminated the city’s authority to annex in this case. LUBA affirmed the ordinance on the merits and rejected petitioner’s argument under the new statute on the ground that it…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stonecrest Properties, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Thunderbird Hotels, LLC v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Cogan v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Wolf v. Oregon Lottery CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API