Legal Opinion

Bloomfield v. Weakland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2005No. CC 003480, 003497; CA A119891; SC S51768PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this dispute involves alleged easements appurtenant to certain subdivision lots. Plaintiffs each claim that he or she has a right to such an easement, and they brought the present action against defendant for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to establish that right. Defendant asserts that plaintiffs are barred from receiving the relief that they seek on the ground of claim preclusion. The trial court concluded that plaintiffs’ claims were not barred and granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the underlying merits of the case (that is, respecting the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wolff v. Du PuisOregon Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Thomas v. US Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Dauven v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
  4. Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Farnsworth v. Meadowland Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API