Legal Opinion

Brunzell Construction Co., Inc. v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1988No. B026133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Defendant Keith Smith appeals a judgment and an order denying his motion to vacate renewal of a January 30, 1970, judgment against him. (Code Civ. Proc., § 683.170, subd. (a).) We affirm and hold that California Uniform Commercial Code 1 sections 9504 and 9505 do not apply where the creditor does not take possession of the collateral or where the debtor consents to a deficiency judgment.

Facts

In 1967 Jalama Valley Cattle Company (Jalama) executed two $100,000 promissory notes in favor of Transamerica Financial Corporation (Transamerica). Keith Smith, the sole shareholder of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. S. M. Flickinger Co. v. 18 Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Kulko v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. FIDELITY CREDITOR SERVICE, INC. v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Earl of Loveless, Inc. v. GabeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Alcock v. Small Business Administration (In Re Alcock)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Estate of WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Van Slyke v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API