Legal Opinion
Alcock v. Small Business Administration (In Re Alcock)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1993No. BAP No. EC-92-1649-AJM, Bankruptcy No. 986-00522, Adv. No. 990-0067PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ASHLAND, Bankruptcy Judge:
The guarantors Charles and Bette Alcock appeal the order of the bankruptcy court allowing the claim of the lender, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). The bankruptcy court found that the SBA’s claim against Alcock was not affected or barred under California Commercial Code §§ 3606, 9504, or California Civil Code § 2819. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
On September 27, 1983' Top Pac Growers and Shippers, a California tomato packing and shipping corporation, borrowed $600,-000 from Crocker Bank through a note guaranteed by the SBA for 75% of the amount…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Joan A. HAGANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cecil ANDRUS, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re: Charles Alcock Betty Alcock, Debtors. Charles Alcock Betty Alcock v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- AmSouth Bank v. Trailer Source, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Regions Bank v. Trailer SourceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010