Kulko v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Shapiro & Thom and Suzie S. Thorn for Real Party in Interest.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.*
In this proceeding brought pursuant to section 418.10, subdivision (c), of the Code of Civil Procedure, petitioner Ezra Kulko seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to vacate its order denying petitioner’s motion to quash service of summons for lack *519of jurisdiction in the underlying action, to establish a foreign judgment of divorce, and to grant said motion. We have concluded that the trial court correctly denied the motion. We deny the petition.
Viewing the evidence under the well-settled rules governing review of an order based on affidavits,1 we set…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Sibley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Responsible Citizens v. SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- In the Interest of M. A. C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.