Legal Opinion

City of Tuscaloosa v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1930No. 6 Div. 628PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The question for decision is: Under the circumstances, conditions, and surroundings, will the proposed filling station constitute a nuisance per accidens?

The action of the building inspector in refusing the permit of petitioner was sustained by the Board of Appeals. And petition for mandamus was filed in the circuit court to Compel said inspector to issue the building permit in question.

The trial thereof was upon oral evidence before the court rendering judgment overruling denial of the desired permit.

The decisions as to filling stations in residential sections are to the effect that they-are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rouse v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. 1st Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Higgins v. BlochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. English v. Progress Electric Light & Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Gillette v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leary v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Acker v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Jackson v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Fletcher v. BarnardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Milton v. MaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API