Legal Opinion

Acker v. Protective Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from the denial of an injunction sought by homeowners to prevent the chiming of certain electronic bell tones (incorrectly referred to in the record and herein as a "carillon"). We affirm.

Protective Life Insurance Company constructed a bar carillon at its offices in downtown Birmingham in 1961. When these offices were moved south of town, to the Office Park area, in an enclave of Jefferson County between the cities of Mountain Brook and Homewood, in 1976, a new carillon was constructed. The bell sounds are broadcast through 16 loudspeakers, and at peak amplification, can be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Clifton Iron Co. v. DyeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. McHan v. McMurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Pritchett v. WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carson v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Gulf House Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of Gulf ShoresSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Martin v. City of LindenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Paint Rock Properties v. ShewmakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. City of Dothan v. Eighty-Four West, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API