Milton v. Maples
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The bill in this cause was filed by complainant, appellant here, to abate a nuisance. The sufficiency of the bill was sustained on a former appeal in the cause, and which was prosecuted from an interlocutory decree overruling demurrers thereto. Maples v. Milton, 232 Ala. 483, 168 So. 868. In the reported case may be found a full statement of the facts upon which-complainant rested the equity of the bill. We will not, therefore, restate them here.
On final submission of the cause, on pleading and proof, the court below held that the complainant had not sustained the averments of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Gillette v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Bloch v. McCownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Nevins v. McGavockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lauderdale County Board of Education v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Shell Oil Company v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Morgan County Concrete Co. v. TannerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Duncan v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Smith v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.