Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Bloch

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1925No. 1 Div. 370PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is a bill in equity by Jacob D. Bloch and others against John R. Higgins and Harry Courtney, individually and as partners under the name of Higgins & Courtney. The bill seeks a permanent injunction against respondents, preventing them from erecting or maintaining or continuing the business of undertakers and funeral directors at a certain place described in the complaint, on the ground it is or will be a continuing nuisance to each of them and others, and to their homes, on account of its close proximity to their residences, and on account of the manner in which such business is intended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Saier v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Nininger v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Beisel v. CrosbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bragg v. IvesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
  2. White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Clutter v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Mutual Service Funeral Homes v. FehlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Gillette v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API