Legal Opinion
Leary v. Adams
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 23, 1933No. 6 Div. 271PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The city of Birmingham, pursuant to express legislative authority (General Acts 1923, p. 581), entered into a comprehensive zoning scheme, passing an ordinance, effective August 4, 1926, by which the city is divided into two major districts, one relating to the use of property and the other to the matter of height and area. Birmingham Code 1930, p. 336.
We are here concerned only with the first, the “Use Districts,” which are subdivided as follows: “A-l-Residence; A-2-Residence; B-l-Residence; B-2-Residence, Commercial, Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial.” Nor is there here…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.