Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Johnson
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Laivrence Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action by Mary Johnson and others against the Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.
Appellees were plaintiffs, and recovered judgment from which the appeal is taken. The circuit judge upon request made a special finding of facts and stated conclusions of law thereon. The appellant excepted to the conclusions, and unsuccessfully moved for a new trial. The *164facts are conceded to be found in accordance ■with the evidence. They are to the effect that defendant is a duly organized corporation; that at the time the complaint was filed and for at least five years prior thereto, it had operated a steam railroad extending from Louisville, Kentucky, to Chicago, Illinois, and through…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. State ex rel. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Town of Rensselaer v. LeopoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Hoffman v. ZollmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AtkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Butler v. City of KokomoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.