Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. Kingsbury

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1884No. 11,599PublishedCited by 92 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellees claim title to a strip of land in the city of Indianapolis, and brought this action to quiet title. On their application the venue was changed to the Shelby Circuit Court, and the case comes to us upon the special finding of facts and conclusions of law stated by that court.

The character of the case made it difficult to make a clear and concise special finding, and that made by the court is very lengthy and much confused, for it blends matters of evidence with matters of fact, and mingles them with matters of law. *203It has been a task not free from difficulty to eliminate…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Rowan's Ex'rs v. Town of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  5. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. City of San Antonio v. GrandjeanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Zell v. American Seating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API