Legal Opinion

Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1924No. 6 Div. 78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This bill is filed by the city of Birmingham against the Birmingham Belt Railroad Company, seeking the removal of two railroad tracks maintained and used by the respondent, located on the outside of a certain strip 26 feet in width in the center »f Thirty-Second street in said city, which said strip is not involved in these proceedings.

That Thirty-Second street has been irrevocably dedicated to the use of the public as a highway, and such dedication' accepted by the city, is well established by the averments of the bill, which was so conceded on the former appeal in this cause. Birmingham…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Burgess & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Reed v. Mayor of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Smith v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Yackee v. Village of NapoleonOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Nolen v. WileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Green v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Hewitt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API