Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Zollman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1912No. 7,572PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Suit by Fred Hoffman against Samuel T. Zollman, Anna C. Zollman, Meda Blackwell and Milton G-. Blackwell. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Appellant, on August 22, 1905, was awarded a contract for paving a part of J street in the city of Bed-ford, and subsequently completed the work to the satisfae*666tion of, and it was accepted by, the common council of said city. At the time of awarding the contract, and at the time the cost and expenses of the improvement were assessed against the property benefited thereby, appellees held the legal title to the north half of lot No. 100 in the original plat of the city of Bedford, having a frontage of ninety feet on J street, and extending back for a distance of ninety-three feet.

This action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Consumers Gas Trust Co. v. American Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co. v. HuncheonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railroad v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Pollnow v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Howard v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Meyer v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Shedd v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API