Legal Opinion
Bonavisa v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.
The petition seeks permission to bring an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, pursuant to article 17-A of the Insurance Law. The petition is defective in two respects.
First, petitioner describes herself as a 11 qualified person.” This is a conclusion. The words ' ‘ qualified person ’ ’ are defined in the statute (Insurance Law, § 601) and a petitioner must set out sufficient facts to bring him within the definition. Specifically, petitioner fails to allege that she is a resident of this State or of a State giving relief similar ito that provided by the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Canty v. Motor Vehicle Accident inDemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- State Farm County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Girard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Portman v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Flores v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnificatifn Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.