Legal Opinion
Flores v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnificatifn Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.
This is an application by plaintiff’s guardian ad litem for leave to bring an action on behalf of the infant for personal injuries and for his medical expenses and loss of services, against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation pursuant to article 17-A of the Insurance Law of the State of New Tort.
It is claimed that the infant plaintiff sustained personal injuries as a result of “ falling off ” the rear of a motor vehicle of a “ hit and run ’ ’ motorist on May 6, 1959 in the vicinity of East 156th Street and Cauldwell Avenue.
The motor vehicle in question was an ice cream…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bellavia v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Bonavisa v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Shaw v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FlaumenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Weber v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Shindler v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Simmons v. RaiolaNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.