Legal Opinion
Girard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1987No. WD 39059PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Presiding Judge.
This is a direct appeal from the entry of summary judgment. The judgment is affirmed.
A sole issue is presented herein, and appellant charges the trial court erred in its entry of summary judgment because there existed genuine issues of material fact as to whether appellant substantially complied with the provision of respondent’s insurance policy and there existed genuine issues of material fact as to whether respondent was prejudiced.
The pertinent facts are as follows: On April 3, 1984, appellant was a passenger in a motor vehicle driven by one Nenita Armstrong. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Greer v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Barfield v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CreasyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Kestner v. JakobeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Laster v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Billings v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Brown v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Welch v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance ExchangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Friend v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Dodson v. State Farm General Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.