Legal Opinion
Portman v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
This is a petition for an order permitting the petitioner to bring an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (hereinafter referred to as MVAIG) under subdivision (a) of section 618 of the Insurance Law.
The facts are briefly summarized. Petitioner, a blind person, had been knocked down by an automobile when crossing a Brooklyn street intersection. While lying on the ground she was again injured when another vehicle, allegedly a “ hit and run ” auto, collided with the first vehicle and caused the latter to strike the injured person a second time.
Police were called…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leppard v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Berger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Leppard v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Berger v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Bellavia v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & ComercheroNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Basch v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Germain v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.