Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Reserve Life Insurance Company appeals from a decision of the Commissioner of Commerce disapproving several of its insurance applications and forms. Reserve claims the agency’s decision was unsupported by substantial evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and based on an erroneous theory of law. It also argues the Commerce Department based its decision in part on an illegal, unpromulgated rule. We affirm.
FACTS
This appeal involves an application by Reserve Life Insurance Company (Reserve) for approval of a number of insurance application and policy forms pursuant to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McKee v. LikinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Bunge Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Frank v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Huston v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.