Legal Opinion
Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 22, 1988No. C7-88-868, C9-88-869PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTON, Judge.
Relators Bethlehem Steel and Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. appeal from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) findings of fact, conclusions of law and order and issuance of a permit dated March 22, 1988. The MPCA’s order denied the request for a contested ease hearing to determine whether parent corporations should be named as parties to a permit applied for by their subsidiaries. The relators claim that by naming the parent corporations as permi-tees the MPCA has exceeded its statutory authority, acted arbitrarily, engaged in un-promulgated rulemaking, violated the due process…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Application of Crown CoCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Cooper v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of People's Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.