Legal Opinion
Fross v. County of Allegheny
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 25, 2011No. 17 WAP 2010PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
Upon certification by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, we accepted for review the issue of whether Allegheny County Ordinance No. 39-07-OR (the “Ordinance”), which imposes residency restrictions on certain offenders, is preempted by the Pennsylvania Prisons and Parole Code, 61 Pa.C.S. § 101 et seq., (“Parole Code”) and/or by the Pennsylvania Sentencing Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9701 et seq. (“Sentencing Code”). The Ordinance applies to offenders subject to the registration requirements of those provisions of the Sentencing Code collectively known as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- United States v. RuddCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.