Commonwealth v. Williams
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE SAYLOR.
These are consolidated direct appeals from the orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, striking down certain provisions of the statute commonly known as Megan’s Law, as amended in 2000. The primary question presented is whether the statute’s registration, notification, and counseling requirements, applicable to individuals deemed sexually violent predators, constitute criminal punishment. Because we find that they do not, we reverse the trial court’s orders and remand for further proceedings.
I
On July 27, 2000, Appellee Gomer Williams sexually assaulted a…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ShugarsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.