Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 2014PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ALLEN, J.:

Braheem Smith (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after the trial court convicted him of one count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (“PWTD”).1

The pertinent facts may be summarized as follows: On August 29, 2010, Appellant, who had been imprisoned at SCI-Hun-tingdon for various drug-related offenses, was released on state parole. See Parole Release Order, 8/29/10. Prior to his release on parole, Appellant, on August 27, 2010, signed a form entitled Conditions Governing Parole/Reparole in which Appellant expressly consented…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Mathis, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Wright, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Com. v. Kuhlman, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API