Legal Opinion

San Francisco Chemical Co. v. Duffield

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1912No. Nos. 3,772, 3,773PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming; John A. Riner, Judge. Actions by Morse S. Duffield and another against the San Francisco Chemical Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WM. H. MUNGER, District Judge.

While the two cases relate' to different mining claims, they were both tried together upon the same testimony, were both submitted to this court upon the same argument and briefs, and the material facts applicable to one are applicable to the other.

It appears that appellant’s predecessors, on or about August 24, 1905, located upon the public lands of the United States, in Uinta ■ county, state of Wyoming, what is designated and known as the Raymond placer mining claim, and on or about September 5)' 1905, located upon the public lands within said county what is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Atherton v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McMullin v. MagnusonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Veale v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Bowen v. Sil-Flo CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Duffield v. San Francisco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  5. Titanium Actynite Industries v. McLennanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API