Bowen v. Sil-Flo Corporation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a declaratory judgment and quiet title action as to unpatented mining claims. The action is, in part, a suit to determine an adverse claim filed in a patent application proceeding as to two placer mining claims. See 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 29-32 inclusive.
This case has previously been before our Supreme Court on the question of whether the Maricopa County Superior Court had jurisdiction of the action, to which an affirmative answer was given. Sil-Flo Corporation v. Bowen, 98 Ariz. 77, 402 P.2d 22 (1965).
The entire area in dispute is covered…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Stech v. Panel Mart, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hiram B. Webb v. Manuel LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Brooks v. TertelingIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.