Legal Opinion
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 10, 2014No. 2 CA-IC 2013-0001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLY, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner Julie Munoz challenges the Industrial Commission’s workers’ compensation award, claiming the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) improperly excluded from her average monthly wage the income she had contracted to receive from her horse training and rehabilitation business. For the following reasons, we affirm the ALJ’s award.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the ALJ’s award. Sw. Gas Corp. v. Indus. Comm’n, 200 Ariz. 292, ¶ 2, 25 P.3d 1164, 1166 (App.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Anton v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Danial v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Gurtler v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Southwest Desert Images, LLC v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.