Legal Opinion
In Re Bozarth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 15, 1936No. 26484PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.
This is a disbarment proceeding.
Petitioner, on December 15, 1933, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of a felony on the charge of obtaining property under false pretenses and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500. An appeal was thereafter perfected to the Criminal Court of Appeals, and that court, on October 12, 1934, affirmed the judgment rendered by the district court. Bozarth v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 424, 41 P. (2d) 924. Thereafter, on November 24, 1934, there was filed by the Board of Governors of the State Bar an accusation against petitioner for disbarment by reason of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ruckenbrod v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re AbramsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Wier v. PetersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- Application of KaufmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.