State ex rel. Steiger v. Capital Gas & Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This is an original action in mandamus. An alternative writ issued. The defendants made a return in due time. Plaintiffs demurred to the return. The pleadings thus raise the question of whether a peremptory writ should issue.
The action grows out of a controversy that has been going on in this state between the state regulatory commission and certain pipeline, distributing and holding companies for several years past.
The defendants comprise a group of gas companies known as the Doherty companies. A phase of this proceeding has been dealt with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Hayward v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Sherwood Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- First National Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Holmstrom v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964