Legal Opinion

Holmstrom v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1964No. 43,555 and 43,576 ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the Commissioner of Insurance to issue a life insurance agents license.

On the 17th day o£ January, 1963, the plaintiff, Paul Holmstrom, filed his petition which, in addition to formal and procedural matters leading to the complaint, stated:

“Defendant Commissioner’s actions are arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful in his refusal to issue a license to plaintiff as above stated and in that:
“A. He has failed, neglected and refused to grant plaintiff any hearing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan. v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Caster v. FlannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Swearingen v. Bond, AuditorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Brinkley v. HassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Bryan v. Columbia Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Sullivan v. Heart Ministries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1967
  4. Pecenka v. AlquestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API