Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1937No. 33,256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was brought to recover from the de*553fendant county the principal sum and interest on two warrants. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendant appeals.

The main question is whether the county is liable for interest on the warrants. The warrants were issued by the county prior to and were outstanding when the 1929 state highway act became effective. (Laws 1929, ch. 225.) The claim was presented to defendant under requirements of the cash-basis law. (Laws 1933, ch. 319.) The claim was rejected and an appeal was taken to the district court. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Salthouse v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. KaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. School District No. 141 v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. In Re Tax Protests of Midland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Brown v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  5. Brown v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API