Legal Opinion

Anwar v. Dow Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2017No. 16-2475PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

Rose Anwar appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims and argues that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and a motion for summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees MEG International and The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) respectively. Anwar also argues that the district court erred in denying her request for additional discovery. We find that these arguments fail and AFFIRM the district court’s decision.

I

Plaintiff-Appellant Rose Anwar, a U.S. citizen, was hired to work for MEG…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Kevin Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Robert Carbone v. Wulf KaalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  3. Jodi Hohman v. Maurice EadieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Advanced Technology Products, Inc. v. Oriental Export Corporation, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
  5. American Municipal Power, Inc. v. Voith Hydro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API