Legal Opinion

Rymal v. Baergen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2004No. Docket Nos. 243795, 248124PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

In Docket No. 248124, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants Herman Baergen and *280MTD Systems, Inc., with respect to plaintiffs claims of sexual harassment and retaliation in the workplace brought pursuant to the Civil Rights Act (CRA), MCL 37.2101 et seq.1 In Docket No. 243795, defendants Clark Products, Inc., and Clark Foodservice, Inc., (hereinafter collectively referred to as Clark) appeal by leave granted an order disqualifying Clark’s counsel for a conflict of interest. Because there exists genuine issues of material fact…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. CenTra, Inc. v. EstrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rdm Holdings, Ltd v. Continental Plastics CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Kloian v. SchwartzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Bergen v. BakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API