Callahan v. Board of Bar Overseers
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.
The plaintiff, an attorney proceeding pro se, filed this action in the county court by way of a verified complaint “in the nature of certiorari and errors and mandamus and prohibition and under M. G. L. c. 211, § 3 et al.” The plaintiff’s complaint sought review of certain actions taken by the Board of Bar Overseers (board) and bar counsel on complaints filed by the plaintiff with the board, regarding alleged misconduct by the individual defendants, and sought review of the board’s investigation of a complaint filed with the board against the plaintiff. As with most of the documents drafted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- In the Matter of SturtzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Price v. ColeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Binns v. Board of Bar OverseersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. Nutter, McClennen & FishMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- In re FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Hurley v. Superior Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Olmstead v. Department of Telecommunications & CableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- In re a Request for an Investigation of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.