In the Matter of Sturtz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Abrams J.
Marc Sturtz appeals from a May 25, 1990, judgment appointing his parents as his permanent guardians and authorizing them to monitor the administration of a behavior modification treatment plan at the Behavior Research Institute, Inc. (BRI). Sturtz requested that the guardianship be discharged. On January 4, 1991, a Probate Court judge found Sturtz to be competent to manage his own affairs, and discharged the guardianship. The case therefore is moot. Nonetheless, Sturtz urges us to answer the questions raised by his appeal, contending that these questions are of substantial public…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lockhart v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Blake v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Wolf v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Metros v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. YameenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beacon Hill Civic Ass'n v. Ristorante Toscano, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Pidge v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar JunctionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Smith v. Commissioner of Transitional AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Mitchell v. MitchellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.