Hurley v. Superior Court Department
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner next filed a petition in the county court seeking a variety of relief in the nature of mandamus and pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. A single justice of this court denied the petition without a hearing. The petitioner has appealed to the full court.
Thomas Hurley, pro se. William J. Meade, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendants.
1. The petitioner sought from the single justice, among other things, review of the rulings by the trial judge and the single justice of the Appeals Court concerning his request for transcripts. The applicable statute, G. L. c. 261, § 27D, plainly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leaster v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Gos v. BrownsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Callahan v. Board of Bar OverseersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
3Cited by16 opinions
- BirchallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Hunt v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SamuelsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BarrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Foxworth v. St. AmandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.