Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crance v. Kennedy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1978No. 77-210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent asserts that the office being sought is not a “public office” and, therefore, not subject to question in a quo warranto action. The statutory scheme of R. C. Chapter 3735 mates this contention untenable. There has been a delegation by the state of some of its sovereign powers.

A metropolitan housing authority may appropriate real property and in doing so shall be exercising “* * * powers and duties conferred upon officers of municipal *167corporations * * *.” R. C. 3735.32. It is exempt from taxation. E. C. 3735.34. It may issue bonds for “any of its corporate purposes.” E. C. 3735.45.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Rose v. JamesOhio Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API