Legal Opinion
Samuel v. Michaud
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided March 7, 1996No. Civil 94-0353-N-DAEPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND SUA SPONTE DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST REMAINING DEFENDANTS
DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.
The court heard Federal Defendants’ Motions and State Defendants’ Motion on February 22,1996. Plaintiffs Charles F. Samuel and Valerie A. Samuel appeared pro se. Assistant United States Attorney Robert C. Grisham appeared for the late Honorable Harold Ryan, the Honorable Edward Lodge, the…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re SilberkrausUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2000
- In Re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Barry v. Sommers (In Re Cochener)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Cox v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.