Legal Opinion
Cox v. Ashcroft
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 19, 2009No. CV-05-149-DCB PPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
The Wackenhut Defendants 1 and the Federal Defendants 2 have filed Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant primarily to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted. 3
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Billy Frank Cox (Cox), filed this action, arising out of his September 1, 1988 arrest, his subsequent criminal prosecution, and his incarceration at a privately owned federal facility in Taft, California. Cox, a pro se prisoner, brought this action pursuant to…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- (PC) Hopson v. Kings County JailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Martinez v. RiosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Contreras v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Fernandez v. DuarteDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Gary Aller v. Kris Mayes, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.