Legal Opinion

Wade v. Board of Administration

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1945No. Civ. No. 12766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Pursuant to the authority granted by section 14 of the Alameda County Charter, authorizing the establishment of a retirement system for the benefit of “county employees,” the board of supervisors passed an ordinance, which was approved by a vote of the electors, setting up such a system. The plaintiff herein holds an elective office in the county, namely, that of county clerk; and he brought this action for declaratory relief against the Board of Administration of the Alameda County Employees’ Retirement System for the purpose of obtaining a judicial determination as to whether an elective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kelly v. LovelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Neville v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Brown v. City of InglewoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API