Legal Opinion
Neville v. County of Sonoma
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 2012No. A132673PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*65Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
Cathy Neville appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her petition for writ of mandate against the County of Sonoma (the County) and the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors (the Board). She filed the petition after the Board terminated her employment as the head of the County’s Department of Agriculture (the Commissioner) and as the County Sealer of Weights and Measures (the Sealer). Neville contends that under the Food and Agricultural Code and Business and Professions Code only the state had the authority to terminate her position. The County and Board maintain that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dibb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Renda v. NevarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Brown v. Pacifica Found., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Brown v. City of InglewoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025
- Brown v. Pacifica Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.