Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Slingerland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 31, 1936No. 30,813PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 265 N.W. 21. An appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing, because of lack of jurisdiction, an appeal from an order of the probate court.
The appellants filed a petition in probate court of Dodge county asking that the administrator of the estate of Tennis Slingerland, decedent, be removed from office. After a hearing the probate court, on June 22, 1935, made an order denying the petition. A notice of appeal and an undertaking, approved by the probate court, were served upon the attorneys for the administrator. The notice and the undertaking and proof of service…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas Peebles & Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- In Re Estate of WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Christian v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Hintermeister v. BradySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Sundet v. SteenersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Estate of DahnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Estate of Van SlounSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- In Re Concer's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- In Re Leary's AppealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.