Legal Opinion

Thomas Peebles & Co. v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1921No. 22,150PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action, in tbe municipal court of Minneapolis for tbe restitution of certain premises. The case was tried 'before C. L. Smith, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendants. From tbe judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, O.

Plaintiff leased an apartment in -an apartment building in the city of Minneapolis to defendant' Sherman for a term beginning July 1, 1919, and ending August 31, 1920, at a specified rental payable monthly in advance. On May 7, 1920, plaintiff executed 'another lease to defendant Sherman for the same premises and on the same terms for a further period of one year to begin on September 1, 1920, and end on August 31, 1921. Both leases contained a provision against subletting, and a further provision authorizing plaintiff to re-enter for breach of the conditions of the lease, without…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Rockwell v. Eiler's Music HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. City of Chaska v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. De Graff v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Sime v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Schoen v. New Britain Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Pushor v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Central Union Trust Co. of N.Y. v. BlankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API