Legal Opinion

Corr v. Hoffman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

In September, 1901, the plaintiff, Peter H. Corr, and the defendant, George F. Hoffman, entered into a written agreement “ to become copartners together in the art and trade of manufacturing, buying, selling and vending rope, twine, hammocks, etc., which said copartnership shall continue from the date of these presents for and during and to the full end and term of three years next ensuing.” The copartnership, so formed, maintained a principal office in Philadelphia and a branch office in New York city, under the firm name of Hoffman-Corr Manufacturing Company. .At the expiration of the term…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Rodkinson v. HaeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Martin v. PeytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Bailey v. Fish & NeaveNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Jim-Mar Corp. v. Aquatic Construction, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Allen v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API