Legal Opinion

Henderson v. De Turk

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1912No. L.A. No. 2887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order denying motion for new trial in an action to quiet title to certain real property in Los Angeles County.

Defendant claims solely under a deed from the state based on a sale and alleged deed to the state on account of delinquent taxes. The deed to the state recited the name of the person assessed as “E. W. Davies,” while the assessment was to “E. W. Davis.”

The law in force both at the time of the sale and the time of the execution of the deed, provided that the deed to the state must recite, among other things, “the name of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Grimm v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bussenius v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Hossom v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Hinds v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. King v. SlepkaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Chambers v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API