Legal Opinion

Walker v. Toledo (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2014No. 2013-1277PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from the Sixth District Court of Appeals, we determine whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the city of Toledo’s civil administrative enforcement of its traffic ordinances violates Article IV, Section 1 of the Ohio Constitution. We accepted the following propositions of law from appellant city of Toledo:

1. Neither R.C. § 1901.20 nor Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 1 are offended when a home rule municipality enacts, by ordinance, a civil administrative process for photo enforcement of speed and red light violation.

2. R.C. § 1901.20 does…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Scott v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bazell v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Banc One Corp. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Barrow v. Vill. of New MiamiOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Magsig v. Toledo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API