Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1992No. 37A04-9105-CV-137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant Timothy Kelly appeals the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants/Counter-Claimants-Appellees J.B. Smith, Robert Parker, Randall J. Nye, Andrew J. Fetsch, and Daniel Glavin (Firm).

We affirm.

Kelly presents three restated issues for our review:

1. whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in its entry of partial summary judgment for the Firm, the counter-claimants;

2. whether summary judgment should be entered for Kelly, the counter-defendant; and

3. whether the trial court erroneously construed the Articles of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Woodward Insurance, Inc. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kelly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kelly v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API