Howard v. Babcock
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
KENNARD, J., Dissenting.
Should an attorney who leaves a law firm be free to compete with that firm? In this state, as in many others, attorneys are bound by a rule of ethics that prohibits them from entering into agreements that “restrict” their right to practice law after leaving a firm. (Rules Prof. Conduct of State Bar, rule 1-500.) The rule serves to eliminate unnecessary and artificial restrictions on clients’ ability to select their attorneys. Yet, the majority, contrary to the unambiguous language of the rule, holds that this rule does not bar law firms from entering into…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHENMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.