Legal Opinion
Howard v. Babcock
California Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1993No. S027061PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
6 Cal.4th 409 (1993)
863 P.2d 150
25 Cal. Rptr.2d 80
THEODORE R. HOWARD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
GEORGE H. BABCOCK et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Docket No. S027061.
Supreme Court of California.
December 6, 1993.
COUNSEL
Layman, Jones & Dye, Stanley R. Jones and Ren R. Hayhurst for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Kenneth E. Owen, Diane C. Yu, Paul W. Vapnek, Quinn, Kully & Morrow, Margaret J. Morrow, Lisa S. Kantor, Dickson, Carlson & Campillo, William B. Fitzgerald and Hall R. Marston as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Morgan, Wenzel & McNicholas and Thomas H. Vickers…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mandelbrot v. J.T. Thorpe Settlement Trust (In Re J.T. Thorpe, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017