Legal Opinion
Inabata Specialty Chemicals v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 13, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-48; Court 01-00600PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court following trial. The merchandise to be classified for tariff purposes is one entry, No. FYI-2004818-3, of chondroitin sulfate (“CS”), entered for consumption on January 22, 2001, and liquidated on April 6, 2001. See Customs Protest Form (May 18, 2001).
The merchandise at issue entered in bulk powder form and was packaged for retail sale as a dietary supplement according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) requirements. The United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maxcell Bioscience, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007